Did Marie Antoinette deserve her infamous reputation?

Marie Antoinette is one of Historys most(prenominal) infamous figures. History has her painted as coquettish spend-thrift adulteress, who participated in numerous promiscuous personal matters and wasted an awful lot of money. save, at a lower place her depicted personality there is somebody else entirely, a caring and devoted mother, still also a brave and hardy woman.Marie Antoinette was born to the outstanding Austrian empress female horse Theresa on November 2, 1755. She was never expected to be a Queen however, she was a inebriate in a plan of her Mothers which multiform marrying all her female children off to inscrutable noblemen from other countries, in order to corroborate Austrias alliances. She left home at the cutting tool age of fourteen, to be married to Louis cardinal of France. In the early stages of her reign, she was much adore by the people of France, for her willingness to interact with her people. However this love soon turned to hatred.She did sacr ifice people in the French court, and a great deal invited an exclusive group of friends to her property in Versailles, and people who werent included began to taunt the queen, with oral communication that would be put into extremes in afterwards long time. She was rumoured and suspected to run through had a few affairs with a number of men, especially Count Fersen with whom she was close friends with. However, this was never turn out with historical evidence.She also indulged in some luxuries such as fine jewellery, replete silks and elaborate clothing, in addition to gambling. Whilst m both of her subjects were starving, esurient and bedraggled, she consistently spent money, sometimes even money that she did not have. She was most famously recorded to have verbalise Let them eat cake when told about the hungry peasants, begging for bread, however she did not enounce that, for it was actually said by a Spanish princess a hundred years antecedent. She also failed for many years to green goods an heir (through no fault of her own) and refused to pay the sillier traditions and people in the court at Versailles.However, she wasnt all that the pamphlets claimed her to be. She was not harsh or cruel, for she was a devoted mother with a loving and caring nature. Secondly when the great mob of people stampeded into the palace, demanding her to be dispatch and slaughtered, she stood on the balcony with musket and loaded pistols pointing at her, and she expert stood there, knowing that she could die at any second. Even when the revolt had come to transfer her, they all lowered their weapons and shouted dogged Live the Queen. She was very brave and influential.Thirdly, she never committed incest or abused her son, and this was virtually definitely a lie by the revolt in order to obtain sure the jury was convinced of her final stage sentence. She was also very noble and not as self centred a s she is remember today for she had several opportunities to trajectory alone but refused to do so without her family. The affair of the necklace was also a order so as to frame her again for doing something she didnt do.I turn over that Marie Antoinette was a dupe of bad timing. I also believe that she was used as a part of scapegoat, for at a time when everything was red ink wrong for France, the people longed for someone they could blame, and she seemed the amend target. Most of the accusations made about her were every exaggerations or wholly fake. Her reputation for infidelity and wastefulness was used by her enemies to incense the masses against the monarchy. It is not true that she was completely innocent, for she was an avid gambler and spender, and this may have had some effect on the economic downturn of France in the 1700s, however I do not believe that she deserve the degree of abuse and reputation that she received.